New Delhi – November 7, 2025
In a landmark verdict aimed at fortifying constitutional protections against custodial overreach, the Supreme Court of India ruled on Thursday that police and investigative agencies must furnish written grounds of arrest to every accused—regardless of the underlying law—in a language they comprehend, rendering any non-compliance grounds for declaring the arrest and subsequent remand illegal. The bench, led by Justices J.B. Pardiwala and R. Mahadevan, extended the mandate from special laws like the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act (UAPA) to all offenses under the Indian Penal Code (IPC) and the newly enacted Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), emphasizing that this "is not a mere formality but a sacrosanct constitutional imperative" under Article 22(1).
The judgment, delivered in the case of *Kannu @ Ajay Sharma vs. State of Madhya Pradesh*—stemming from a 2019 arrest in an Arms Act violation—builds on the apex court's 2014 *Arnesh Kumar* guidelines, which curbed routine arrests in offenses punishable by less than seven years. "The right to be informed of the grounds of arrest is the cornerstone of personal liberty," Justice Pardiwala observed in the 45-page order, underscoring that verbal intimation alone falls short of the "full and effective" disclosure mandated by the Constitution. In a pragmatic carve-out for "exigencies," the court allowed oral communication in high-risk scenarios but stipulated that written grounds be provided at least two hours before the accused's production before a magistrate, ensuring judicial scrutiny isn't undermined.
The ruling addresses a scourge of arbitrary detentions plaguing India's law enforcement landscape, where over 1.3 million arrests occur annually—many for petty or bailable offenses—leading to overcrowded prisons and prolonged undertrials, per National Crime Records Bureau data. Activists hailed it as a "game-changer" for vulnerable groups, including the poor and minorities, who often face "preventive" arrests without recourse. "This will force police to think twice before cuffing someone on a whim, reducing the misuse of Section 41 CrPC as a tool of harassment," said senior advocate Sanjay Hegde, who wasn't involved in the case but lauded the emphasis on linguistic accessibility—requiring grounds in the arrestee's preferred language or one they understand.
Implementation directives are unequivocal: Arrest memos must be signed by a witness (family or independent), countersigned by the arrestee if possible, and uploaded to the Crime Criminal Tracking Network & Systems (CCTNS) within 24 hours for transparency. Non-adherence could vitiate the entire process, from arrest to remand, with courts empowered to quash proceedings or grant immediate bail. The bench also mandated nationwide training for police within six months, tasking the Bureau of Police Research and Development with crafting model formats in regional languages.
Critics, however, flag enforcement hurdles in resource-strapped rural stations. "While the intent is noble, without digital infrastructure upgrades, this could become another paper tiger," cautioned former Delhi Police Commissioner R.K. Raghavan. The Union Home Ministry, in a preliminary response, pledged compliance via circulars to all states, aligning with Prime Minister Narendra Modi's push for "citizen-centric policing."
As India grapples with rising custodial deaths—over 2,000 reported since 2020—this verdict injects urgency into reforms long overdue. For the average citizen, it means one less fear in the shadow of the khaki: the right to know why freedom is snatched away, etched in ink and understood in words that resonate
For More News Updates Follow Us On Www.tconews.in
