Bengaluru, December 21, 2025
In a stormy session marked by slogan-shouting and walkouts, the Karnataka Legislative Assembly and Council passed the controversial Hate Speech and Hate Crimes (Prevention) Bill, 2025, on December 19, igniting a fierce backlash from the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP). The opposition has decried the legislation as a "draconian tool" designed to muzzle free speech and target political rivals, signaling deepening rifts in the state's polarized political landscape.
The bill, introduced by the Congress-led government under Chief Minister Siddaramaiah, aims to curb rising incidents of communal violence and online vitriol by classifying hate speech and crimes as cognizable, non-bailable offenses. Under its provisions, perpetrators of hate crimes—defined as acts causing physical, psychological, or economic harm based on religion, caste, gender, or other protected identities—face up to seven years in prison and a fine of Rs 50,000. Hate speech, including verbal or written incitement to hatred, carries a lighter penalty of up to three years imprisonment or a Rs 5,000 fine, or both. The law also empowers authorities to order the swift removal of offending online content and establishes special courts for expedited trials.
Supporters, including Congress leaders, hail the measure as a long-overdue response to Supreme Court directives on hate speech, emphasizing its role in fostering social harmony amid a surge in divisive rhetoric. "This is not about politics; it's about protecting vulnerable communities from the poison of hate," said A.S. Ponnanna, a senior Congress figure, dismissing BJP protests as "baseless opposition without even reading the draft."
However, the BJP's vehement opposition has cast a shadow over the bill's passage, with party lawmakers staging dramatic disruptions in both houses. The six-hour debate in the Council devolved into chaos as BJP members alleged the legislation hands unchecked powers to the executive, potentially criminalizing legitimate dissent. "This bill is a silencer straight to the BJP's throat," tweeted Gururaj Anjan, a vocal BJP supporter, capturing the party's simmering outrage.
At the heart of the BJP's anxiety lies a profound fear of selective enforcement. Union Minister of State Shobha Karandlaje, a prominent Karnataka BJP leader, lambasted the bill as a ploy to "strengthen the Congress's anti-BJP fact-check team," accusing it of transferring judicial authority to political whims. In a press conference on December 20, she vowed to escalate the matter to the Governor under Article 200 of the Constitution and, if needed, the President, urging a veto to prevent it from becoming law. Karandlaje's remarks underscore the party's broader narrative: that the Congress, emboldened by its 2023 assembly victory, is weaponizing the law to suppress Hindu nationalist voices and appease minority communities.
BJP legislators, including Chalavadi Narayanaswamy, warned during debates that innocuous expressions like "Jai Shri Ram" or critiques of government policies could be twisted into "hate speech" offenses, landing critics behind bars for years. On social media, BJP loyalists amplified these concerns, with posts decrying the bill as a "Muslim-appeasement tactic" that erodes OBC quotas and stifles pro-Hindu sentiments. "The sole motive is to suppress nationalist and Hindu religious voices," asserted Dr. Nikhil Anand, BJP OBC Morcha general secretary, in a widely shared post.
Analysts point to the timing and context as fueling BJP's trepidation. With local body elections looming in early 2026, the party—still smarting from its 2023 ouster—fears the bill could hobble its mobilization efforts, particularly in communally sensitive regions like coastal Karnataka. The legislation's broad definitions, critics argue, risk chilling public discourse, echoing national debates over sedition laws and IT rules that the BJP itself has championed in the past. "Even the worst BJP government was better than the best Congress one," lamented a BJP-aligned user on X, highlighting the irony in the opposition's stance on free speech.
The Congress counters that safeguards, such as exemptions for religious texts and artistic expression, prevent misuse, and that the BJP's meltdown reveals its discomfort with accountability. "Terrified BJP bhakts are scared they won't be allowed to sow hate," quipped Lavanya Ballal, a Congress media panelist, in a viral thread.
As the bill awaits the Governor's assent—expected within weeks—the standoff has escalated into a high-stakes constitutional tussle. BJP sources indicate plans for legal challenges in the Karnataka High Court if it receives approval, potentially prolonging the controversy into the new year. For now, the legislation stands as a litmus test for balancing security and liberty in India's fractious democracy, with the BJP's worries laying bare the razor-thin line between curbing hate and curbing voices.
For More News Updates Follow Us On Www.tconews.in
