Andhra Pradesh Government Proposes Social Media Monitoring Law, Sparking Privacy Concerns
Amravati, August 20, 2025 – The Andhra Pradesh government has announced plans to introduce a new law aimed at curbing the spread of false and defamatory content on social media platforms. The proposed legislation, which builds on amendments to the Andhra Pradesh Prevention of Dangerous Activities Act of 1986, seeks to enhance monitoring and regulation of online content. However, the move has raised significant concerns among digital rights activists and citizens regarding potential infringements on privacy and freedom of expression.
Background and Legislative Details
The initiative follows a series of incidents involving alleged defamatory posts on social media targeting prominent political figures, including Chief Minister Chandrababu Naidu, his son Nara Lokesh, and Deputy Chief Minister Pawan Kalyan. According to sources, the state government has already passed the Andhra Pradesh Prevention of Dangerous Activities Act-1986 (Control of Dangerous Activities Act) Amendment Bill in the Assembly, with the law awaiting the Governor’s approval to come into effect.
The proposed law empowers authorities to arrest individuals who post "obscene messages, photographs, and morphed videos" intended to defame others, with potential penalties including up to one year of imprisonment. The legislation also expands the scope of the 1986 Act, originally designed to address illegal activities such as liquor and drug trafficking, to now include social media offenses.
Home Minister Vangalapudi Anitha emphasized the government’s intent to counter "baseless campaigns" that damage Andhra Pradesh’s reputation. She announced the formation of a fact-finding committee to verify information and combat misinformation, with strict actions, including sedition charges, promised against those spreading false content.
Implementation and Monitoring
To enforce the law, the Andhra Pradesh government plans to establish social media monitoring cells in every district, a concept initially proposed in 2019 under the Disha Act, which addressed crimes against women and children. These cells will identify and report objectionable posts, enabling swift police action. The government has already begun identifying individuals involved in posting defamatory content, with cases filed against several suspects, including some located in Hyderabad, Bengaluru, and abroad.
Director General of Police K.V. Rajendranath Reddy previously highlighted the need for such measures, citing instances like the Agniveer riots in Secunderabad and violence in Konaseema, which were fueled by inflammatory social media posts. He stressed that monitoring would focus on publicly available content to avoid infringing on privacy rights.
Privacy and Free Speech Concerns
The proposed law has sparked widespread debate, with critics arguing it could undermine fundamental rights. Digital rights activists warn that the legislation’s broad and vague provisions may lead to excessive surveillance and censorship. The requirement for social media platforms to remove content flagged as false by government fact-checking units, as mandated by the 2023 amendment to the Information Technology (Intermediary Guidelines and Digital Media Ethics Code) Rules, has already faced criticism for potentially stifling free speech.
The absence of a comprehensive data protection law in India exacerbates these concerns. While the Digital Personal Data Protection (DPDP) Act, 2023, established a Data Protection Board, questions remain about its independence and effectiveness. Critics argue that without robust privacy safeguards, social media monitoring could lead to unauthorized data collection and misuse, particularly given past instances of unchecked surveillance, such as the use of tools like AASMA by over 40 government agencies to track social media activity in real time.
In 2021, WhatsApp filed a lawsuit against the Indian government, challenging rules that required tracing the "first originator" of messages, arguing that such measures would break end-to-end encryption and violate privacy rights. The case underscored tensions between government oversight and user privacy, a conflict that remains unresolved.
Broader Context and Implications
The Andhra Pradesh initiative aligns with broader national efforts to regulate social media. The Information Technology Act, 2000, and its 2021 and 2023 amendments impose strict content moderation responsibilities on platforms, including the removal of defamatory or harmful content within 36 hours of a legal order. However, these regulations have been criticized for lacking judicial oversight and for their potential to curb dissent.
Globally, governments face similar challenges in balancing regulation with individual freedoms. In India, the Supreme Court has repeatedly raised concerns about misinformation on social media, particularly its impact on judicial proceedings, urging stricter regulations. Yet, the court’s call for oversight has also sparked debates about the risk of political influence over digital platforms, with instances of content removal linked to ideological differences.
Public and Expert Reactions
Civil society groups and technologists have called for a collaborative approach to regulation, involving platforms, governments, and stakeholders to create transparent and balanced policies. Recommendations include investing in AI-driven content moderation, enhancing digital literacy, and adopting privacy-enhancing technologies like end-to-end encryption.
On X, sentiments reflect the polarized nature of the debate. A post by @NowAndhra highlighted the government’s resolve to tackle fake news through the new law and fact-finding committee, garnering support from some users who see it as a step toward accountability. However, others expressed skepticism, citing risks of overreach and suppression of legitimate voices.
Looking Ahead
As the Andhra Pradesh government awaits the Governor’s approval to enact the law, the state is poised to become a testing ground for stringent social media regulation in India. While the government argues that the measures are necessary to maintain public order and protect its reputation, the lack of clear safeguards and oversight mechanisms raises questions about their long-term impact on privacy and free expression.
The debate underscores the need for a delicate balance between combating misinformation and safeguarding individual rights. As India navigates this complex digital landscape, the Andhra Pradesh law could set a precedent for how states approach social media governance, with implications for both citizens and platforms nationwide.
For More News Updates Follow www.tconews.in
