Moscow – November 7, 2025
In a stark escalation of Cold War-era brinkmanship, Russian President Vladimir Putin has directed his top security officials to prepare proposals for resuming nuclear weapons testing—the Kremlin's first such detonation since 1991—framing it as a "reciprocal" riposte to U.S. President Donald Trump's recent threats to revive American atomic trials. The move, announced during a tense Security Council meeting on November 5, has drawn swift condemnation from Western capitals as a desperate ploy born of battlefield frustrations in Ukraine, where Russian advances have ground to a bloody halt despite months of grueling assaults.
Putin, flanked by Defense Minister Andrey Belousov and Chief of the General Staff Valery Gerasimov, underscored Russia's fidelity to the Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty (CTBT)—from which Moscow withdrew its ratification in 2023—while vowing parity if Washington crosses the threshold. "Russia has always strictly adhered to the Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty," Putin stated, his voice steady in state media footage. "However, I warned that if any state begins conducting nuclear tests, Russia will respond accordingly." Belousov, in a bolder interjection, urged "immediate" groundwork for a full-scale blast on the remote Novaya Zemlya archipelago in the Arctic, citing U.S. "modernization" of its arsenal as an existential peril.
The directive arrives against a backdrop of mutual recriminations. Trump, in a Fox News interview last month, accused Russia and China of covert underground detonations and pledged to "end the testing ban" to restore U.S. primacy, prompting a U.S. Air Force Minuteman III intercontinental ballistic missile test launch from Vandenberg Space Force Base on November 4—unarmed, but symbolically loaded. Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov dismissed the U.S. claims as "unfounded hysteria," but conceded the need for "assessments" on test readiness, which experts peg at several months to years given Russia's rusting infrastructure.
Analysts portray Putin's gambit less as iron-fisted resolve and more as a symptom of strategic atrophy. "Putin's endless nuclear threats are a sign of Russian weakness," argued Atlantic Council senior fellow Peter Dickinson, linking the rhetoric to Moscow's failure to seize key Donbas hubs like Pokrovsk, where street fighting rages amid Ukrainian drone swarms and Western-supplied ATACMS missiles. With Russian casualties topping 700,000 per U.K. estimates and conscription evasion spiking at home, the nuclear card serves as "psychological compensation" for territorial stagnation, Dickinson added. NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg echoed this, calling the threats "escalatory bluster" designed to deter further U.S. aid to Kyiv, which just unlocked $61 billion in fresh munitions.
Global ripples are immediate and ominous. The U.N.'s International Atomic Energy Agency warned of a "new arms race" spiral, with simulations forecasting heightened miscalculation risks in crisis flashpoints. China, Russia's nominal ally, urged de-escalation while quietly accelerating its own silo expansions, per U.S. intelligence. In Europe, Polish and Baltic leaders clamored for bolstered U.S. troop rotations, fearing spillover from the Ukraine quagmire. Even in non-aligned quarters, Indian and Brazilian envoys at the G20 decried the posturing as "irresponsible," invoking the 1996 CTBT's near-universal norm—ratified by 187 states but never entering force due to U.S. and Russian hesitance.
For Ukraine, the shadow looms largest. President Volodymyr Zelenskyy, fresh from a Brussels summit securing F-16 jets, branded Putin's order a "terror tactic" to fracture allied resolve, vowing "no surrender" as Russian forces inch toward the Dnieper River line. Yet, with winter gales grounding drones and freezing trenches, the nuclear specter injects fresh peril into an already existential fight.
As Moscow's war machine sputters—its economy strained by 16% interest rates and oil revenues halved by sanctions—Putin's atomic feint underscores a paradox: a superpower reduced to bluffing with doomsday devices. Whether this precipitates actual tests or merely more red lines in the sand, the world watches a tinderbox where one spark could ignite apocalypse.
For More News Updates Follow Us On Www.tconews.in
