The Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP)-led central government under Prime Minister Narendra Modi passed the Nari Shakti Vandan Adhiniyam (Constitution 106th Amendment Act, 2023) in September 2023, reserving approximately one-third of seats in the Lok Sabha, state legislative assemblies, and Delhi Assembly for women. The bill, passed with overwhelming support (454-2 in Lok Sabha, unanimous in Rajya Sabha), was hailed by the BJP as a historic step toward women-led development, building on schemes like Beti Bachao Beti Padhao, Ujjwala Yojana (LPG connections for poor households), and Mudra loans for women entrepreneurs.
Yet, the legislation has reignited sharp criticism over alleged double standards. Opposition parties and activists point to high numbers of crimes against women in BJP-ruled states, high-profile cases like Hathras, Unnao, and Manipur, and the bill's delayed implementation (tied to post-census delimitation, likely after 2026). They argue the quota bill serves as optics while ground-level failures in women's safety persist. The BJP counters that crime data reflects better reporting, not governance failure; law and order is a state subject; and the party has delivered convictions, fast-track courts, and empowerment programs. Here's a detailed, data-driven look at the claims.
# The Women's Quota Bill: Long-Pending Reform Finally Delivered
The idea of women's reservation dates back to 1996 but was repeatedly stalled across governments. The BJP government introduced and passed it in a special parliamentary session in 2023—the first bill discussed in the new Parliament building. It reserves 33% seats for women, with sub-quotas for SC/ST women, for 15 years (extendable). Implementation awaits the next census and delimitation exercise.
BJP leaders, including PM Modi and Union Minister Smriti Irani, frame it as part of a broader "Nari Shakti" agenda: improved sex ratio (now 1020 females per 1000 males per some government data), 10 crore+ Ujjwala connections, and increased female political participation at panchayat levels (already ~50% in many states via prior local reservations). The party argues it fulfills decades of unkept promises by previous regimes.
Critics, including Congress leaders, acknowledge the passage but call it "too little, too late" and note the non-immediate rollout benefits BJP strategically (delimitation could reshape constituencies favorably). Some opposition voices question why the bill wasn't prioritized earlier during BJP's 10+ years in power.
# NCRB Data on Crimes Against Women: BJP-Ruled States Dominate Absolute Numbers
The latest National Crime Records Bureau (NCRB) Crime in India 2023 report records 448,211 crimes against women nationwide—an increase from prior years (428,278 in 2021, 445,256 in 2022). Rape cases stood at around 29,670–31,677 (IPC), with overall crimes against women up marginally in some categories but showing rises in reporting.
Absolute numbers paint a stark picture for BJP-governed states (as of 2023 data):
Uttar Pradesh (BJP): 66,381 cases (15.4% of national total) — highest.
Maharashtra (BJP-led alliance in 2023): 47,101.
Rajasthan (BJP): 45,450.
Madhya Pradesh (BJP): 32,342.
Together, BJP-ruled states accounted for over half of national cases per some analyses. Rape-specific tallies from 2023 reports and summaries show Rajasthan leading (~5,078 cases in some citations), followed by Uttar Pradesh (~3,516) and Madhya Pradesh (~2,979).
Caveats are crucial for context:
Population matters: UP (most populous state) and Rajasthan naturally report higher absolute figures. Per lakh population rates show variation—Rajasthan had a high reported rape rate (~15.9 per 100,000 in earlier comparable data), while UP's rate was lower (~2.8). National rape rate hovered around 4.9–6 per 100,000.
Reporting vs. incidence: Experts note increased police sensitization and awareness (post-Nirbhaya reforms) lead to more FIRs. Many crimes (89% of rapes) involve known persons, often domestic.
Not exclusive to BJP: Bihar (non-BJP or mixed) and other states also feature high in some categories. Overall crimes against women rose nationally across regimes.
Opposition parties (e.g., Congress, Samajwadi Party) argue BJP's "double-engine" governments (center + state) have failed on law and order, with data exposing hypocrisy in claiming women's empowerment. BJP responds that absolute numbers ignore improved conviction mechanisms and that underreporting was worse pre-2014.
# High-Profile Cases Fueling Accusations of Mishandling
Critics cite specific incidents in BJP-ruled states as evidence of systemic disregard:
Hathras (2020, Uttar Pradesh): A 19-year-old Dalit woman was allegedly gang-raped and murdered. The Yogi Adityanath government faced accusations of police delay, victim-blaming, and hasty cremation at 2:30 a.m. without family consent (allegedly to destroy evidence). Five officers were suspended; compensation and a job were promised but the family claims non-fulfillment years later. Four accused were convicted, but the family alleges the accused roam freely in the village. The case sparked national protests over caste and gender violence.
Unnao (2017, Uttar Pradesh): A minor was gang-raped by then-BJP MLA Kuldeep Singh Sengar and associates after seeking job help. Her father died after alleged assault by the MLA's supporters; she attempted self-immolation outside the CM's residence. The CBI took over; Sengar was convicted and sentenced to life in 2019 (BJP expelled him). However, a 2025 Delhi High Court order suspending the sentence drew fresh outrage, with the survivor fearing for her life.
Manipur ethnic violence (2023 onward, BJP-ruled state: Clashes between Meitei and Kuki communities led to over 200 deaths and widespread sexual violence. A viral video showed two Kuki women being paraded naked, assaulted, and one gang-raped by a mob after police allegedly handed them over. PM Modi broke silence after two months, calling it a "disgrace" and vowing action. CM N. Biren Singh faced criticism for delayed response and internet shutdowns. Multiple cases were reported; the Supreme Court and national outrage followed.
In each, BJP governments faced charges of initial cover-ups, political protection of perpetrators (where linked to leaders), and delayed justice—contrasting with the quota bill's rhetoric. The party points to eventual arrests, CBI probes, and suspensions as evidence of accountability, arguing isolated failures do not define policy.
# BJP's Defense and Broader Record
The BJP emphasizes proactive measures: fast-track courts for rape cases, POCSO enhancements, and schemes directly benefiting women (e.g., sanitation reducing vulnerability). It notes crimes against women rose under previous governments too and attributes high figures partly to "political motivation" in reporting. On the quota, it stresses cross-party passage and long-term impact on representation.
# The Debate: Optics vs. Outcomes
The women's quota bill marks undeniable legislative progress after 27 years of delay. Yet NCRB data, combined with high-visibility failures in BJP strongholds, sustains opposition claims of double standards—promoting reservation while states under its rule report disproportionate absolute crimes and mishandle emblematic cases.
Crime is multifaceted (socio-economic, cultural, enforcement gaps), and no single party "owns" the problem. However, ruling parties bear responsibility for state-level policing. As delimitation looms and elections approach, the gap between policy pronouncements and street-level safety will likely remain a flashpoint. Whether the quota translates into substantive change—or remains symbolic—will depend on implementation and sustained governance focus on women's security.
For More News Updates Follow Us On www.tconews.in
